Bing Bang Boom
For most current scroll down to bottom
My Take in Wars and Defense:
May 25, 2015:
The US Military must change it's way of doing Business
But before it can do that, the US needs to redefine the term defense, meaning both US defense budget as well as defense dispensed as foreign aid type defense.
Military aid to foreign countries must be changed.
The only way the US should give military aid to other countries is if they allow enough land for a US Military base in their country.
There should no be any more handing over anything more than hand held machine guns and ammo to them.
As for sophisticated equipment, trucks, tanks, planes and Missiles should only be allowed in the possession US Military troops hands or UN allies working directly with the US battling the same conflict.
Gone should be the days when we fund countries like Israel with money for defense.
Since 1967, the US Tax payers have been forking over $3.15 billion dollars per year, (Update: Obama increased it to over $5 Billion per year,) to a small country of 9 million that is no less than a war machine manufacturing business.
The US has been paying Ideal enough money to put a small country in the 4th place as the largest weapons manufacture in the world.
What the US funding build is not likely known and where it all ended up after being sold for a profit is unknown as well .
Think about it, in two more years, by 2017, the US has handed over $3.15 billion times 60.
That's $189 billion to a country of only 8 million people. And if you add stuff like the $420 million Obama gave them last summer to reload during cease-fire, while killing the Palestinians is as good as 1/5th of a trillion dollars.
Get this: $3.15 divided by 8 million, equals $ 393.75 per person to make a bomb, every year, year after year. Pretty soon they have so many bombs, that they end up needing to sell them or blow up something if they want to continue making bombs. That means they have to kill something, with the US Tax Payer's money.
I'm kinna up in the air on even trying to train some of these 8%ers because as we've learned from the past with Iraq, it sure hasn't done much good.
Pick your Poison
Since the US Military is a volunteer military. Fighting battles and or wars should be voluntary as well. I think when it comes to the Marines and other troops that fight our battles should have a little more control upon which conflict, or which battle they can be assigned to.
As far a raising moral, it would do a tremendous amount letting one who sign up, with say a few close friends, are able to go fight the same battle and be placed in the same unit if the troops in question are qualified to fight that kind of battle or fill such a position.
War has changed. It's probably because there is so much weaponry out there on the market and anyone holding some rich guy up for ransom is able to get their hands on enough money to buy enough military muscle to take over a small city. It's not as much of a war as it is an organized robbery, to get even more money of course.
Never the less, now day with brain capacity running at 8%, the ability to brainwash people through the internet and people are stupid enough to fight of what is no more than a religion to justify evil actions.
We've found ourselves fighting against and organization rather than just another country.
When a country is not in control of itself, sending someone like John Kerry over there with a check book and a few shipments of those pallets the US Tax Payers paid for is going to go no where except in a room waiting for ISIS to come pick up their merchandise.
John Kerry is only Feeding ISIS with US bought and Paid for equipment.
Come on; do you think John Kerry is going to get Iraq to pay for anything?
I saw one of those rooms full of ammunitions on TV myself.
I bet they took bids on the stock piles over a face book or tweeter page.
Heck they fled because there wasn't anyone left in the town anyways and ISIS will come to town, pick up their merchandise and take it Syria as they have in the past.
There won't be any fight to get back the city because nothing will be there anyways.
PM Update on new shinny weapons.
They should the Iraqi's unwrapping the new weapons the stupid Americans supplied them with to replenish the ones they just sold to ISIS.
I bet ISIS only takes five of the six tanks, because they will probably use the fuel in one just to refuel the trucks and Hum Vs they came in.
But I can imagine the armored personnel carriers and Hum-V they scored on have to have fuel too. So you will find a burned out tank a couple hundred miles out of town once they top all the fuel tanks off with it.
Never the less, I bet ISIS scored on about $50 Million dollars worth considering that the tanks alone cost the US Taxpayers about $36 Million. Armor Personnel carriers go for $3-4 Million, and have Caterpillar diesel engines and Allison transmissions in them. (The makings of a pretty good tractor.)
Sure they will win back the city, because the Iraqi's bank accounts went up because of the supplies the US is stupid enough to give to them.
Do you think ISIS paid any more than $2 million for all that?
I seriously doubt much more than that.
And on the Afghan front:
Tell me that the US isn't about to leave a bunch of equipment behind like they did in Iraq. And tell me that the Taliban isn't going to swoop in and grab up all that equipment.
I wonder if they pay anything at all for it.
Ah I bet they will.
Up to a Thousands:
3, 7, 19, 30, 38, 42, 49, 50, 51, 84, 85,
June 9, 2015:
Is a third batch on the way?
Or did they already go through that and we're about to send a fourth, or even fifth?.
Are you telling me that you owe me $40 Million for what ISIS bought off the Iraqi's for only $10 Million?
Boy as far as business plans go. It would be good for everyone all around if the US government would just buy the last batch back from ISIS for $100 Million and save the US Tax Payers $100 Million on the next batch nbecause the US would only be paying 50 cents on a dollar.
We, -the US would get them for half price and ISIS would make $90 Million on a $10 Million Dollar investment from just buying them from the Iraqi's for 4 cents on the Dollar.
I'm willing to bet that those guys down at ISIS would just go party somewhere for almost a year until the money runs out.
Just call it our $100 million per year war and since my brilliant idea saves you so much money since you'll be getting the goods at 50% off, could you please just cut me a check with all the money you saved for my cut.
Just one batch would bring me in $20,000,000.oo and maybe if you recycle the trucks back and fourth, you won't have to build anymore trucks and you won't have to pay me any more either.
Like I said, a war for a year for only $100 Million, can't get any cheaper than that.
$2 Billion more off to ISIS:
Rule Numbers- 9, 42
June 11, 2015:
Two training bases
But not enough recruits to use both.
They say they have 9,000 and 3,000 defectors.
Unclear is whether that 3,000 is part of 12,000 or is it 3,000 defected from the 9,000, which would mean 6,000 .
Withe the benefit of the doubt, $2 Billion divided by say 10,000.
Yeah, you think putting an average of $200,000.oo in the hands of a man who was living in a dirt hut. And the game plan is not to consider they will naturally have the desire to sell everything we give them.
If they think they have 9,000: maybe they should figure it being about 6,000 when you get the next batch of deserters, -who were working for ISIS when they signed up..
How would I handle ISIS?
June 11th, 2015:
The so called Game Plan:
Something after a whole year, the President of the United States says they still haven't come up with a Game Plan, or asy they say, "strategy."
Oh on Obama turning his back on the President of Iraq:
I don't think the jester was anything like the media portrayed it as..
I think it was that, oh I don't know the guy so well when in actuality, you're in cah-hoots with the guy and now that everyone is aware of the war for the sake profits, you want it to look differently
Isn't their Rule Number 9 for that?
As for A Plan:
War should be fought in Two Types of Battles
The two types would have to be considered either a Paid for Battle or I a Good Samaritan Battle.
The Easiest to describe would be the Good Samaritan Battle.
A war at which the US is engaged at the expense of the US Tax Payers .
And the other is Paid for Battle which is more like sending Mercenaries where the unsettled Country the US is defending or fighting for,
-is paying the cost of occurrence .
Gone would be the days of the US flipping the bill for military defense of other countries as a financial aid. Gone would be the check the US cuts to other countries like Israel and Egypt year after year whether they are at war with another country or not.
Rule Numbers- 20
June 14, 2015:
They didn't want US there:
In fact they encouraged us to leave..
We liberated them from and Evil ruler and set them up with a new government and a military and Police force.
Then they sold off all the hardware to their enemy .
I think the Iraqi's need to pay for every piece of hardware they get from the US. And if they want the US to fight for them, they should be paying the US to do it. And if they want the US to put Boots on the ground, those Boots should not be ordered to go there unless they choose to do so.
Of course, I just described what a Paid for Battle should be.
A Good Samaritan Battle should be also at the choice of the Troops themselves.
I feel the US would be better off putting together units along with the support staff to go into places like Libya and Syria to fight ISIS as a A Good Samaritan Battle .
Same thing should go with the Battle in Yucrain and a few other African countries.
September 26, 2012 thru November 13th, 2012
January 2008 thru April 11th, 2012
Back to top
Speilberg's Lousy Page
for Private Inventors
when Obama took his mighty pin to the bill.
January 2008 thru April 11th, 2012
2008 campains & elections
Bill Clinton mud
Over the Hill dirt
Reasons why I would not
want to be President
I found this web-site that is titled
Clinton's body count
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
screws over the Solar Industry in California, and Newsweek Magazine still calls him green.
Hey check out this e-mail
I got from a political robot.
Are we so Stupid?
N.Y. Gov. Eliot Spitzer
hooked by Ashley Alexandra Dupre
March 10-14, 2008
Stupid people tend to vote Democrat by default.
I know I've mentioned before about the fact that there are many people who feel that the the Republicans are for the rich and the democrats are for the poor and working class.
BUT as I've mention before, both parties happen to know who actually goes down and votes in November. Both parties know that it is not the poor and the youth. It's the elderly and the wealthy that vote and contribute to the campaign money chest; both parties have known that for years.
However lets assume there are number of those
who vote with one party or another just as many of you happen to think the same way with the religion they choose. Some are born into a religion and some decide one their own.
Regardless, what ever the method they chose to decide is up to them, but I'm afraid that there isn't much thought put into it. (Like Clinton said him self, that it is usually one little thing, like how he was on abortion.)
Basically it's usually one simple reason in one area of expertise if I might say in such a way.
Never the less, I'd like to mention the stupid voters that are bound to be on the rise in all the states.
Well the way I see it, the Democrats would rather have us all stupid. Stupider the better
because stupid people tend to vote Democrat by default.
Why, Must you ask?
Well, there just happens to be more poor stupid people than rich stupid people.
October 16th, 2012 :
They got a article on A-13 of the IBD about Obama Care.
It is pretty pathetic. About 15% of the Hospitals are predicted to go bankrupt because of OBama .
Another thing I wanted to mention
is that they just made it legal for members of Congress to make profits in the stock market from insider information. Something they had made illegal back in 2004. So much for stopping the corruption they say.
I've got a bit of information about the defense contractors profits I'll try to post tomorrow. And get this, just by cutting defense budget by 11%, it is saving the tax payers 4% of there annual debit. Gee, that means if they would cut it by 55%, that would equal a savings of 20% of what we are suppose to hand over to the government. Now you have to ask yourself: do you need a killing machine that bad?
I found this web-site and they actually let me post something on it.
Sept. 17th, '10: I've been wanting to.
write this bit for a while,
as to why we need to do some kind of drastic campaign reform in
order to keep from becoming nothing but a big war machine.
Got this friend with the sneakiest laugh.
He's an ex- Marine, who fought the Vietnam war.
We watched the Hurt Locker together.
Mr.M. was involved with blowing up POW's that were use as human shield for fuel supply.
I had read all about this stuff in a book by Terry Read who started out
as a marine and ended up working for the CIA later figuring out where
all these POWs and Fuel Stations are.. (Somewhere - need to find- Book
Mr.M somehow found himself in trouble for doing something wrong or
another. But the reaction was that the military, used it against him in
order to make him do some more crazy stuff that wasn't exactly on the
What ever this crazy stuff was, his wife would not watch the Hurt Locker with us.
really bothers Mr.M is the fact that a person can walk into a building
in Nevada, sit in a comfortable chair, in an air conditioned room, can
fly and airplane on the other side of the world and drop bombs on
people and watch it all on a TV screen.
A man can do this all day and then walk out of the building at the end of the day and drive his car home to his wife and kids.
"There's just something about that, that really gets me." he said.
I hear you bud.
My Synchro-link truck
Check it out at Synchro-link.com
a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of
opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of
increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror
to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear."
-- Harry S. Truman,
message to Congress,
August 8, 1950
Obama's Lousy Page
I have to give the >RollingStone Magazine a plug for their Sept. 6th issue.
bit on the money wasted and lost in this war Bush has got US into.
I wish RS would post
the whole article on their website so I could just post a link to it.
Boy, Halliburton sure took US to the cleaners.
How about going to
My Flyer in
MORE CURRENT EVENTS
I've decided to post an old log from my stats I saved since the summer of 2007.
It's from the:
US Treasury Department. --
Executive Office Of Asset Forfeiture
I take it's the Office that has everything to do with damages the
government pays out in law suits. And boy did they spend some time
reading the good stuff.
Funny: on the same day I got a visit from the CIA also.
August Stats enjoy.
Guess what Craps?
An analogy about how I was set-up by Congresswoman Louis Capps with the use of insurance fraud.
Congresswoman Louis Capps Making millions from the defense contractors by aiding them the efforts to steal inventions from the inventor Dennis Sattler of the Synchro-link by the way of criminal prosecution for hire and using San Luis Obispo as a social experiment.
More info to the story at:
Back to top
Bing Bang Boom
My Take in Wars and Defense:
Originated on May 25, 2015:
Giving War and destruction its own page
Gotta have it I guess.
I think this topic of discussion has been covered in spots throughout the years. But in the past few days, I've realized I should be building a page just for that, just so everything is in one spot and accessible, like I've been doing with the My Theory Page that is an extension my Profile page.
Maybe I should call it the Bing Bang Boom page, the page on Defense and the Wars we pay for.
Book Excerpts at
Back to top